Quickgene
01 / Technology

Orthogonal analytics for peptide drugs

02 / How we work
1
Requirements discussion

Tell us the molecule, development stage and regulatory target. We propose an analytical plan within 2 business days.

2
Method development & confirmation

Platform methods are adapted to your peptide and formulation; key parameters are confirmed before sample commitment.

3
Measurement

SV-AUC, CD, icIEF and reporter bioassay runs are performed on the same sample set under controlled, documented conditions.

4
Integrated report

Cross-method interpretation aligned to ICH Q6B / Q5E, with raw data and method descriptions.

03 / Bioactivity & potency

Cell-based luciferase reporter gene bioassay

01
Reporter gene principle

Stable cell lines co-expressing GLP-1R (or GIPR / GCGR) and a CRE-luciferase reporter: agonist binding triggers the Gs → cAMP → CRE cascade driving luciferase expression, and luminescence is read as the pathway-activation signal.

02
Relative potency

Dose–response curves and model parameters support comparison with an agreed reference. Relative potency is reported when the comparison is suitable.

03
Multi-target bias profiling

For dual and triple agonists such as tirzepatide, retatrutide and mazdutide, parallel assays on GLP-1R, GIPR and GCGR reporter lines characterize each receptor pathway and quantify activity bias relative to the reference product.

Explore cell-based bioactivity and relative potency
04 / Quality & compliance

Documented for regulatory scrutiny

Studies are executed under controlled conditions with GMP-like documentation practices. Reports map each result to ICH Q6B characterization and ICH Q5E comparability expectations, and to compendial methods in USP, Ph. Eur. and ChP where applicable.

ICH Q6B
Structural characterization framework
ICH Q5E
Comparability study design
USP · Ph. Eur. · ChP
Compendial method alignment
GMP-like
Documentation & data integrity
05 / Orthogonal coverage

Which question does each method answer?

ParameterSV-AUCCDcIEFNotes
Aggregation & oligomersc(s) distribution, % monomer/aggregates——AUC is matrix-free; orthogonal to SEC
Molecular weightSedimentation-based estimate——Confirms identity & oligomer stoichiometry
Secondary structure—α-helix / β-sheet (far-UV)—Fingerprint vs. reference product
Tertiary structure—Near-UV aromatic profile—Sensitive to folding changes
Thermal stability—Tm from thermal melt—Formulation ranking
Charge heterogeneity——pI + acidic/basic variant %Deamidation monitoring
Identitys20,wSpectral fingerprintpIThree independent identity criteria
Self-associationConcentration-dependent sIndirect—Key for lipidated peptides
Sample per studyLowLowLowOne sample set for all four

All four methods are run on the same sample set and reported together — no method substitutes for another; each answers a different physical question.

01
Truly orthogonal

Sedimentation, optical spectroscopy, charge-based separation and cell-based bioactivity rest on independent principles — regulatory-grade triangulation.

02
Formulation-realistic conditions

AUC measures in solution without columns or membranes; CD and cIEF run in your actual formulation buffer.

03
Low sample requirement

A single, small sample set feeds all four methods — critical in early development when material is scarce.

Need orthogonal data on your peptide?

Discuss the method, reference standard, sample conditions and documentation with our team.

Request Assessment